Big B caught red handed in a lie, pees in his pants
While it is true that IPL is sucking most of the oxygen out of the market right now, the TRP rating fiasco has nothing to do with that. Big B simply lied.
Just to clarify. TRP is not an absolute measure like for example one inch or one cm is. It is therefore not universal nor portable. The measure is limited to the boundaries of its market and to the time period for which the calculation has been performed. In short, TRP ratings is a complicated dynamic calculation. It is valid ONLY for the market for which it was been calculated for. Also it is valid ONLY for the time period for which it has been calculated for. Overtime as the number of channels within a market changes and as the overall TV viewership changes, so does the implication of these ratings. Hence a score of 1 today is not the same as a score of 1 yesterday. Therefore we cannot use ratings from 3 years ago to compare ratings with shows running today.
Even after knowing the above, Big B wrongfully used TRP ratings to lie and to make it appear that his KBC had more viewership. Just so that you understand this, let me repeat, SRK’s KBC had more viewers than Big B’s KBC yet had a lower TRP (because over 3 + years all the factors had changed).
When Big B was caught, he responded by peeing in his pants. 
See below:
Related posts:
WTF?
What is my purpose for reported this story? What significance is this story to the readers? If you really don’t care about the readers, and if you find out your just here to take random jabs at various celebrities, then that’s fine. As long as we’re clear about your purpose.
I have no idea what “silly mid” means.
ppl have so many titles and so many stories for srk and co also….
You hate Amitabh bachachan… good for you ..
you should not talk about decency.. it does not sound nice from you
and for u manoj like amitabh says Rihstey mein hum tuhaarey BAAP lagtey hai …baap
and one thing is for sure BIG IS CLEARLY d best bcoz den bcoz u ppl seem mad abt him even if he pees in his pants u make it ur headline dat means he is clearly d blog puller(as dey say crowd puller!!!) uske bin a site kaun dekhega ..
rajeev this is not for u…
picture means movie
and the story line is true very natural
all the incidence shown in this movie r true with no fiction plz children above 12 can see this movie if you r 12 yrs or above, click yes and if you r under 12 yrs, click no
shann bhai mera matlab
movie
Yes but he has everyright to say what he says on blog …u right some many things ..evry blogger says so many things which r sometimes backed by false justifications so dat doesnt mean ur going to make fun of everybody by giving such kind of headlines…bcoz u hate amitabh and some of the bloggers dat doesnt mean u will write like this…go to communities on orkut where srk is compared to gays … do u think dat will make u an anti srk supporter …man as i have always said Amitabh is a legend u cant take dat from him…
SRK has said so many things so many times which r not gud at times why dont u highlight those things????
Mate ppl worship amitabh when he was ill d whole country was with him…nobody commands dat respect today…maybe rajni kanth…write wateva u want to right Amitabh will always be a legend who has taken Indian cinema to next level and hope his son does d same..
12 anti Big B ppl will make any difference to his already big fan base and he has acheived wateva he had to..He was Number 1 ..was one man industry…got married to jaya bahudri who was number dat time…got his son married to aishwarya rai oen of d most beautiful woman on this planet…and has finally helped his sons career wat else he needs to acheive ..srk has to first look at his IPL team, his family nd many more things before u can worship him and call him a legend he certainly has wat it takes to become a legend but time will tell
gud luck mate by 2morrow u will have 60 70 comments on dis article of urs ur clearly increasing ur TRP ratings
BIG B
Presenter of Kaun Banega Crorepati, India’s version of Who Wants to be a Millionaire
The first Asian actor having a wax model of his likeness displayed at Madame Tussaud’s in London, UK
Highest paid Bollywood actor in the film industry.
Was named Actor of the Millennium in a BBC News Poll ahead of such luminaries as Charlie Chaplin, Sir Lawrence Olivier, and Marlon Brando.
Was considered ‘finished’ in the late nineties after super star status for 20 years, a string of flops and failed political and business ambitions. But made an unexpected comeback as host of the popular TV quiz series “Kaun Banega Crorepati?” (2000) which put him right back on the number one spot of Bollywood actors over 40, reaffirming his reputation as the living legend of Indian cinema
Guys ,
Instead of arguing,lets wait till 4 th of june.
As sarkar raj releasing on that day and the entire bacchan family is there.This is one of the most Anticipated movie of Ramu .Since the movie Sarkar was good and already have a brand name,so anything less than 95 % opening would be unacceptable.
Lets see the crowd pulling capacity of the bacchan family on the opening day.
I would see how many of the bacchan fans would catch up the movie on its first day.
Arun,Nishit,sean,Sushant ,
Hope you guys listening.
Then we woulod debate again.
Amitabh Bachchan (Hindi: अमिताभ बच्चन. Pronunciation: /əmitaːbʱ bətʃtʃən/ born as Amitabh Harivansh Srivastav on October 11, 1942 in Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, is one of the most prominent Indian film actors of Hindi cinema. He gained popularity in India in the 1970s as an action hero and over the decades of his career which have since spanned numerous film genres, he has become one of the most prominent figures in the history of Indian cinema. Bachchan holds the record for the most number of Best Actor nominations at the Filmfare Awards and has won three National Film Awards and twelve Filmfare Awards to date
ab dekho ham sunnatey hey daastan dekhtey jao
Nishit,
“”"Highest paid Bollywood actor in the film industry.”"”
Are you talking about 1978 or 2008.
If it is 1978,then you might be right.
If you are talking about 2008,then i believe you do not have adequate information.
Nishit,
Dont tell me how many nominations for Amitabh.Tell me how many he has won .
SRK has got 15 Filmfare award.AR rehman has the highest of 19(Which includes awards in other south indian langages too)
This for your info.
v no how gud r indian awards …theyr held at yash raj studious so obviously srk will get awards
Nishit,
Then you have forgot to type 1990 in your post.
Nishit,
Amitabh have done highest number of movies with Yashraj.
If awards are purchased,why cant BIG B buy them.Afterall ,they say,they are the most powerful family in the Bollywood???
Nishit,
Then how many awards out of those 12 ,did Amitabh purchased from Filmfare???
[edit] Paanchvi Fail On Filmy
A show named “Kya Aap Paanchvi Fail Champu Hain?” airing on Filmy From June 7, 2008. This Show is Parody of Kya Aap Paanchvi Pass Se Tez Hain?, hosted by comedian Sunil Grover under the name of “Ruk Ruk Khan
Nishit,
FYI Filmare shifetd to Yashtaj studios two years back only.
What a logic,Where Amitabh doent get an award,this is piurchased.
I mean this guy called Nishit is insane or what???
Filmfare Awards South (India)
1993 - Filmfare Best Music Direction - Roja
1994 - Filmfare Best Music Direction - Gentleman
1995 - Filmfare Best Music Direction - Kadhalan
1996 - Filmfare Best Music Direction - Bombay
1997 - Filmfare Best Music Direction - Kadhal Desam
1998 - Filmfare Best Music Direction - Minsaara Kanavu
1999 - Filmfare Best Music Direction - Jeans
2000 - Filmfare Best Music Direction - Mudhalvan
2001 - Filmfare Best Music Direction - Alaipayuthey
2006 - Filmfare Best Music Direction - Sillunu Oru Kadhal
Filmfare Awards (India)
1995 - Filmfare Best Music Director Award - Rangeela
1998 - Filmfare Best Music Director Award - Dil Se
1999 - Filmfare Best Music Director Award - Taal
2001 - Filmfare Best Music Director Award - Lagaan
2002 - Filmfare Best Music Director Award - Saathiya
2002 - Filmfare Best Background Score - The Legend of Bhagat Singh
2004 - Filmfare Best Background Score - Swades
2006 - Filmfare Best Music Director Award - Rang de Basanti
He also won a “Filmfare R D Burman Music Debutant Award” for Roja’s dubbed Hindi version.
2007 - Filmfare Best Music Director Award - Guru
2007 - Filmfare Best Background Score - Guru
[1]
mate ar rahman has won 21 not 19 so correct ur info u laready weak filmy knowledge
nishit,
Why are yopu trying to prove that you have really gone insane.
Nishit,
You are right .Its 21 not 19.
Even i saw the Filmfare mazine.
But SRK has got the highest for any HINDI movie actor .14.
Amitabh have got 12
everybody knows the credibility of awards…go to india fm any news channnel after awards are announced ppl know how dey got it…plz i hope u watch TV mate dis is discussed everytime and for ur info
mahur Bhandarkar is also planning his new movie on awards …
Yes i know ,Amitabh cud get only 12.even in 40 years.
Tha means he didnt have the money to purchase it right???
Then how come he was the highest paid actor????
Now dont tell me Amitabh didnt purchase because he lost all his money in politics and Bofors scandal
do u seriously think SRk deserved all d awards didnt he manipulated some ????tell me seriusly not as an srk fanatic but as a viewer…dont u think hrithik deserved an award for lakshya???
why is it dat when srk does a film like swades media and his fans go gaga over him dat srk has acted finally
den wat abt aamir who does it so regualry and never gets an award..
and just to let u know Anil Kapoor got award for Beta which he didnt deserve aamir got 2 nominations for dil and jjws
Anil kapoor throwed a party at his house at same night before d award was going 2 be announced ….from dat time filmfare lost its credibility
in bofors he got clean chit so u r saying indias legal system is wrong ?????
and talking abt bofors do u know srks father in law Maj chibba was court martialled from d army
Nishit
can you elaborate how SRK got the bset actor award for 2007.How much he paid to all the award organisors???
If he has really paid,heck,this guy must be really rich man.
Because there are atleast 15 award functions in India.
And i believe in IIFA also awarsd must be purchased.How much BIG B takes for giving an award since IIFA is organised by bacchan.
Nishit,
Thanks for giving me such an importnat info, pls tell me man how much would Amitabh take for distributing awards inj IIFA????
why big b has been choosen as ambassador for IIFA why not SRk ??? ya he is rich man dont u read times of india ..who is saying srk is not rich r u nuts or wat…he owns a bloody loosing cricket team he must be rich man
Nishit,
In 2004 ,SRK got for Swades, an i truel;y belive he deserved that award ahead of SRK.In fact i has voted for SRK that year.
Nishit,
how many times shoulod i tell that KKR is earning profit.
But tell me man how mkach is Amiatbh asking for the award in IIFA.????
oho fimlfare runs on votes hahhaha wat ajoke he acted better den hrithik in lakshya wow mate hey what was so special abt swades wat did he do dat he got d award ..
why didnt aamir got for rdb and mangal pandey etc etc
oho fimlfare runs on votes hahhaha wat ajoke he acted better den hrithik in lakshya wow mate hey what was so special abt swades wat did he do dat he got d award ..
why didnt aamir got for rdb and mangal pandey ???
Nishit,
At times even Filmfare has goofed up.No doubt about it.
But who do think should have won the award in 1993(baazigar),1995(DDLJ),1997(DTPH),1998(KKHH),2000(Devdas),2004(Swades) and 2007(CDI).
I know there might be some debate in 1998.But rest are clearcut cases.
well big b is asking 2 billion dollars dats wat industry sources say (HAHAHA!!) i thought u know everything so u must be knowing shit man ur waste
Nishit,
I believe Aamir deserved the award for RDB.But for mangal pandet.Forget it man.
why not critics award also ???for mangal pandey????tellme give me reasons wat did he do wrong in d film???and u havent answered my question why not hrithik for lakhshya he depicted a true story of army mens wat else was needed to get an award ???
Nishit,
But in that year ,Munnabhai was there for grabs,so aamir missed it again.
Nishit,
Commonj Man,
I mean mangal pandey was one of the shittest movie of that year.Why should he get an award for this???
well 1997 sunny deol for border … 1995 joint winners aamir for rangeela nd srk for ddlj ..2007 darsheel with srk not critic but in popular category bcoz d film was equally popular
Nishit,
Nothing to laugh man.If you dont know ,then aske me.
Filmare awarsds are based on 50 % Jury and 50 % public votess.
Votes are given in tye internet and are also publicised in every national daily.
shahrukh khan has 7 filmfare awards
how may amitab has plz tell me nishit
you pig
mangal pandey was shittest movie dats y it got an awesome review from taran adarsh got a aweosome start and aamir acted well iam asking abt acting wat was wrong with aamirs acting???why didnt he get an award???even swades was a flop but srk acted well (for a change) and got d award mate….why???
Border was d biggest hit of 1997 alongwith gupt if iam not wrong
Nishit,
1995 was clear cut.It was SRK all the way.
1997.Do you want the people to give an award to sunny deol only because he shouted in BORDER.Then in that case what was wrong in Gaddar.Why it was given tp Aamir??
why nt aamir for sarfarosh and sanjay dutt for vaastav???not even a critic???
oh he shouted and movie ran full houses dat means ppl in india are idiots dats wat ur saying …2morrow mimoh will shout and he will get an awrd for jimmy???
and since u seem to have so much knowledge abt awards and movies and actors can u plz tell me how was d head of d jury of filmfare awards???
oh he shouted and movie ran full houses dat means ppl in india are idiots dats wat ur saying …2morrow mimoh will shout and he will get an awrd for jimmy???
and since u seem to have so much knowledge abt awards and movies and actors can u plz tell me how was d head of d jury of filmfare awards??? and why he was removed when lagaan was nominated ????
oh he shouted and movie ran full houses dat means ppl in india are idiots dats wat ur saying …2morrow mimoh will shout and he will get an awrd for jimmy???
and since u seem to have so much knowledge abt awards and movies and actors can u plz tell me how was d head of d jury of filmfare awards??? and why he was removed when lagaan was nominated ????
this will test ur knowledge mate???and will give u d answers why aamir was nt given awards which he deserved??
Nishit,
Aamir won the award for best actor critic in 2006 for RDB.
I belive Sanjay won for vaastav.
who won in 1999 ,i dont remember.But but it is certainly not SRK.
oh he shouted and movie ran full houses dat means ppl in india are idiots dats wat ur saying …2morrow mimoh will shout and he will get an awrd for jimmy???
and since u seem to have so much knowledge abt awards and movies and actors can u plz tell me how was d head of d jury of filmfare awards??? and why he was removed when lagaan was nominated ????
this will test ur knowledge mate???and will give u d answers why aamir was nt given awards which he deserved
Nishit,
Pls tell me who got best cinematography in 1956??
This would test your film knowledge too.
Nishit,
Aamir was given the award in 2001 for laggan.
Check your facts.
shahrukh khan has 7 filmfare awards
how may amitab has plz tell me nishit
you pigg
it was sanjay for vaastav in 1999 bcoz srk had no hits otherwise he would surely got an award …
kahlid mohammed was d jury member of filmfare and editor also who was very upset with aamir bcoz he didnt do his movie fiza and movie got delayed and hrithik finally did it ….it came in times of india dat before lagaans nomination khalid was removed from filfare since lagaan got sleected for academy awards and ppl would have reacted badly if aamir was not given award so dey made him get out of filmfare khalid mohammed
shahrukh khan has 7 filmfare awards
how may amitab has plz tell me nishit
you pig g
nishit
how many hits amitab has given alone sice 1990
plz tell me
you pig
mate just to let u know iwas born in 80’s so i dont know mate sorry plz enlighten me …and as far as i know der wasnt any award for cinematography during dat time filmfare only had 5 sets of categories den …
adn mate just let me know why it happens???
aamirs movie gets best music award
best director
best supporting actor
best film
but heroine (juhi chawla hum hain rahi pyaar ke) but not best actor
whereas in oscars generally awards (best actor and actress)are one by movie which has all d things perfect
how many fans did amitab has
nishit iam asking all these question from u
piggg
Big B ruled in days when Bollywood has zero competition. Today we have cable, internet, sports, DVD and to top it all piracy. Hence SRK’s achievement is so much greater.
Nonetheless please note, a flop movie like Shakti or Hey Ram () is like water off SRK’s back. No producer or financier will hold it against SRK. These were not counted as SRK movies. Similarly a super hit K3G or KANK will never be seen as a feather in Big B’s cap (the benefit will always acrue to SRK ) as these were SRK movies. In essence, what I am saying is that the Big B Vs SRK list (in this thread) is unintentionally skewed in Big B’s favor, yet SRK comes out ahead.
Moreover Producers and Financiers don’t make movies to earn a hit or a super hit label from Mr. Gupt Gyan. They make movies to earn money. A hit label and an IFFA award is many ways is not as meaningful as the overall absolute money that a movie grosses (people cannot live off awards and labels). From this perspective you will find that even SRK’s commission earner makes more money (actual absolute physical money not some statistical or financial ratio) than Big B’s hits
bhai toh toh peechey hein pad gaya hai man ima not gud in maths so i dont count fans of Big B (kuch mar bhie gaye hongey afterall he ruling from 1970 uc) aur tu wohi karan johar ke numbers dega mujhey jo usney aur farah ney ginney thei munna baccha hai tu filmy knowledge mein tu baccha hai abhie jaa rajeev bhaiyya ko bhej he has some knowledge
The problem is that people believe that SRK is better in terms of box office record. The shows, parties and getherings where all these stars come, people proves that people like SRK more this proving better Star power and while comparing acting
1. Romance Role: SRK proved himself as better actor than Amitabh
2. Villaneous Role: SRK proved himself as better actor than Amitabh
3. Gangster/Fighting Role: Amitabh proved himself as better actor than SRK
4. Patriotic Roles: SRK proved himself as better actor than Amitabh
5. Remake Roles: SRK proved himself as better actor than Amitabh
6. Comedy Roles: Nobody has ever done ultimate acting which people liked very much.
7. Entertainment / Fun Roles: SRK proves better than Amitabh
8. Angry Man role: Amitabh proves himself as better actir than SRK.
If you talk about Box Office Comparison as the topic of discussion here, never in the history of Bollywood it happened that Distribution Company purchased the movie for more than double the cost of the movie. It happened for SRK movie OSO when it was made for 35 Cr and Distribution Company Eros International purchased it for 75 Cr making it already a Blockbuster before its release. This is the Star Power or Box Office Power which SRK has. Then comes critics, critics have rated this movie so high that everybody is asking for it to have a watch. This is Blockbuster in terms of his acting. Another big thing is people. People liked his acting so much that people are coming again and again to watch the movie, even I watched it twice in threatre, and OSO broke all records of all times. thus making it a blockbuster in terms of BO in only one week. No movie got this much acclaim in terms of BO Impact, in terms of SRK Star Power and in terms of SRK acting.
bhai remake roles i heard DON got smashed by critics….
Comedy — Bombay to goa dekha hai????? ya chupke chupke???
villain — bhai dewaar dekh ke aa all time hit …alhtough anjaam i also liked
To the people who dont know that Amitabh did not retire temporarily in 1991 as he gave movies Zulm Ke Hakomat(1992), Khuda Gawah (1992), Akka(1994) special appearance, Insaniyat(1994), Tere Mere Sapne(1996) Narrator, Mirtyudata (1997), Major Sahab(1998), Bade Miyan Chote Mian(1998), Lal Badshah(1999), Sooryavansham(1999), Hindustan ke Kasam(1999), Kohram(1999), Hello Brother(1999). In all these period Amitabh Star power was not that much high until he appeared in Mohabatein and got fame. This made him rise in KBC and then from KBC and KKKG he got great star power so much so comparison were started between SRK and Amitabh. He even did lead roles in movies later like Aks(2001), Ankhein(2002), Kante(2002), Baghban(2003), Deewar(2004), Black(2005), Baabul(2006), Sarkar(2007). Although he is giving 5 to 7 movies a year but atleast one or two movies as lead role is enough to get him in the list of actors who are doing lead roles till now. Even Aamir Khan gave only 4 movies in last 6 years in a lead role. So we cannot finish Amitabh star power count till 1991. He has to face Star Power Comparison till now if he s doing movies in lead role till now. Yes we can say it in this way that after 1991 he is a complete failure and Amitabh success rate is less than even 35 to 40% and he still has to give atleast one solo all time blockbuster. Lets pray for him that he can deliver that. All my prayers are with Amitabh to deliver one good movie to come to the list of highest Star Power people like Dilip Kumar, Aamir, SRK who already gave Solo Blockbusters.
bhai gahjini ke baarein mein aapka ki rai???? 90 crore +purchase aur aamir ke baarein mein aapki rai unki acting unke roles???
jai,
The hit/superhit movie names 1990 onwars are as follows, u swine….
1. Hum
2. Insaniyat
3. Agneepath (BIG B won a national award)
4. Aaj Ka Arjun
5. Mohabbattein
6. Bade Miyan Cote Miyan
7. Kabhi Khushi Kabhi Gham
8. Ek Rishta
9. Aankhen
10. Kaante
11. Waqt
12. Bunty aur Babli
13. Black
14. Sarkar
15. Baghban
16. Khakee
17. Ganga (Bhojpuri movie)
18. Cheeni Kum
Ab kutte ki tarah bhonk….ya katega….
The acting of SRK in his last five movies is also outclass and marvelous. He did top notch acting in Paheli(Artistic Character Role), KANK(Negative Character Role), Don(Fighting/Angry man Role), CDI(Patriotic Character Role) and OSO(Fun/Entertaining Role). The variety of outclass acting which he has given proves his versatility in all his movies.
bhai aab tu mast baatein kar raha hai ….atleast justfying ur answers …but mate who did ur father and mother like at der time????
why was he judged best actor of millenium by BBC and sholay getting best movie award best movie for last 50 yrs
arun want to change something in list or i start my words
plz look in to the list that you have told me
plz check it you crapp amitab kay baree mai bhi information nahi hai crap
bhai kutte ki tarah bhonk uske jagah srk ke ki tarah bhonkaana likhna tha na he is dog dont u know dat
bbc sucks
wat abt the site i told you crap
where amir was sitting and naserudin shah was there too
pig
arey bhaiyya lado mat dont behave like kamraan azaam d porki araam sey comments maaro
bhai tu pig mat bol varna u r gonna get some really gud replies which will be directed towards u and ur entire family which includes ur dog srk alrite mate take a chill pill and behave like a human
IS SRK A COMEDIAN?……YES. Check the movie Yes Boss (He was nominated for filmfare best actor), Baadshah (Got nominated for Filmfare Best Comedian Award), One 2 Ka 4. Check the movie Kabhi Han Kabhi Na (He was nominated for critics filmfare best actor award)
IS SRK A ACTION HERO?…YES. Lots of movies of Sharukh as action hero. No need to tell. Recent copied role of Don (He got nominated for Filmfare Best Actor Award)
IS SRK A VILLAN?……..YES. The name Rahul was the recognition of SRK and started with his movie Darr. Then comes Anjam. Another SRK sentence K..K..K..Kiran got fame which was for his villaneous role. He got Best villan award as well.
SRK IN KBC? KBC reached heights due to SRK and SRK is doing third term for KBC.
WHY DID HE COPY DON?…..to show that a repeated Don role can be done at par or better again. He made DON blockbuster again.
WHY DID HE COPY DEVDAS?..to show that a repeated Love role can be done at par or better again. He made Devdas blockbuster again. Very less actors are able to do good in the copied roles and turned the movie blockbuster again and SRK is standing on top in the list.
One should not pray for other’s sickness and one should not feel joy on other’s sadness
Jai,
I will give u back in the same coin since u were the one hwo has started unparliamentary language. So both can play the same game, u see. Mind it!!!
nobody in the world of acting can be equal to shah rukh khan. he makes sub standard movies extra ordinary via his perfomance,but indian industry did not utilize his capacity properly.they can take him also those type of well written social asspect movies in which sanjevee kamar and nana patikar acted.today indian directors and producer just want to get success,but they are misused shah rukh khan and waste his energy,on the other hand amitabh bachchan is only the name u cannot compare him with shahrukh khan because shah rukh khan is beyond all other actors
bhai phir mast dilaogue wah so if DOn was not made in d first place he wouldnt have done anything????
Plus everynody knows how well don did and got how many nominations???hey mate how many national awards for srk as besta actor???
amitabh just got it for black !!
i am talking about the list that you have given me the hit list of amitab after 1990
make some changes in it or you will not be in a condition to stand infront of me
theek bhaikamran ham srk ko muesuem mein band kar dengey khush!!! so dat he cant be compared to anybody….
Has anyone noticed all of Amitabh’s hits has come from films with other superstar casts like Dharmendra in Sholay, Srk in KANK and K3G, Rajesh Khanna in Anand, Vindo Khanna and Amjad Khan in Muqaddar Ka Sikander, Amjad Khan in Laawaris, Dilip Kumar in Shakti shall i carry on………..
Srk’s hits has seen him as a lone actor like Baazigar, Devdas, Kuch Kuch Hota Hai, Dil to Pagal Hai, Om Shanti Om, Don, Chalte Chalte oh and of course DDLJ.
SRK’s the best in the industry Amitabh doesn’t even make my top ten his stardom was the fact he was shot in real life during a film (that’s how UK’s ch4 put him in the 100 top actors list), look at Govinda the most under-rated actor in Bollywood who made the top ten of the BBC’s best actors list the only down fall was that Bachcan topped that list again down to sympathy.
accha can u c me ????mate dont challenge me otherwise i will produce list of some of d most crappiest stuffs from srk;s career
common wat abt koyla
guddu
maya memsahab (a porn kind of a movie)
one 2 ka four
yeh lamhein hai judai ke
chamatkaar
oh darling yeh hai india,king uncle
trimurti
raam jaane
enlish babu desi mem ,
chahat list is endless
arun
dont give false statement make some changes in hits of amitab
that you have presented
go and check his box office report after ward 1990
even bucchans fans dosent know about amitab so shameful
to arun
Chaahat
Army
Dushman Duniya Ka
Gudgudee
gave 4 flops in 1994 srk
Has anyone noticed all of Amitabh’s hits has come from films with other superstar casts like Dharmendra in Sholay, Srk in KANK and K3G, Rajesh Khanna in Anand, Vindo Khanna and Amjad Khan in Muqaddar Ka Sikander, Amjad Khan in Laawaris, Dilip Kumar in Shakti shall i carry on………..
Srk’s hits has seen him as a lone actor like Baazigar, Devdas, Kuch Kuch Hota Hai, Dil to Pagal Hai, Om Shanti Om, Don, Chalte Chalte oh and of course DDL J.
SRK’s the best in the industry Amitabh doesn’t even make my top ten his stardom was the fact he was shot in real life during a film (that’s how UK’s ch4 put him in the 100 top actors list), look at Govinda the most under-rated actor in Bollywood who made the top ten of the BBC’s best actors list the only down fall was that Bachcan topped that list again down to sympathy.
josh
zamana deewana
dil aashna hai
yeh lamhe hain judai ke
duplicate
badshah
paeli
swades
don (new one)….all flops
followed it in 1999 4 flops baadshah was avg though but since he is a great actor (kamraan and co says ) and abbas mustan was director it should have been a hit
ha ha
new don a clean hit and blockbuster in overseas
blindli followers of amitab ho ho
flops
1. Anand
2. Bombay to Goa
3. Namak Haram
4. Majboor
5. Chupke Chupke
6. Do Anjaane
7. Kabhi Kabhie
8. Adaalat
9. Khoon Pasina
10. Kasme Vaade
11. Mr. Natwarlal
12. Ram Balram
13. Yaarana
14. Namak Halaal
15. Aakhree Raasta
16. Shahenshah
17. Hum
18. Khakee
Shahrukh is the greatest ever star in bollywood’s history. There is no doubt about it now after Chak De and OSO’s massive success. And he still has many more years in front of him.
bombay to goa flop ??/ ru kiddin mate??? and khakee and Hum hahahah and anand also mate u go back to pakistan
Rank Film Year Nett Gross Adjusted Nett Gross Verdict
1 Sholay 1975 15,00,00,000 162,97,00,000 All Time Blockbuster
1 Mughal E Azam 1960 5,50,00,000 132,69,00,000 All Time Blockbuster
3 Mother India 1957 4,00,00,000 117,30,00,000 All Time Blockbuster
c number is sholay dats why he is number 1
Hope at least god can decipher your lines of thought….. In case he is able to, hope he is also successful in putting an ounce of sanity in you…… Our wishes are with you…..
accha kamraan u said dat and we will believe it hahahahah
Big B has not even good enough an actor to play a straight on Devdas. While in his prime he was always sidelined as an actor (few awards).
Compare that to SRK. SRK is most definitely a mega super star, also the finest star actor Bollywood has ever seen.
Has Big B done anyone a favor by extending his career to this age ? Sure he is still working but at what cost ? Who is watching Big B’s Aag ? Face it, today Big B is as irrelevant as Dev Anand . He was better off retiring in the 80s. Today he has sadly eroded the legacy that was gifted to him so lovingly by Indira Gandhi. I sincerely hope you are not suggesting that SRK should also likewise destroy his credibility (which in SRK’s case is hard earned and self made) ?
wah kamraan kahan sey itni mast angrezi?????cut paste kiya na …besharm
1. Chamatkar
2. Dil Aashna hai
3. King Uncle
4. Maya memsaab
5. Oh darling yeh hai India
6. Zamana Deewana
7. Guddu
8. English babu Desi mem
9. Ram jaane
10.Duplicate
11.Koyla
12.Trimurti
13.Anjaam
14.Army
15.Chahat
16.Dil se
17.Achanak
18.Baadshah
19.Phir bhi Dil hai hindustani
20.yeh lamhe hain judai ke
21.Dushman Duniya ka
22.Hey Ram
23.Josh
24.gaja gamini
25.One 2 ka four
26.Asoka
27.Hum Tumhare Hain Sanam
28.Gudgudee
29.Shakti-The power
30.Swades
31.Paheli
32.Silsilaay
33.Don
34.I see you
35.Krazzy4 (if u can incl JBJ, why not spe. appearances also)
Abhi picture bahur baaki hai…..
Yeh saari films SRK ki flop films hain:
1. Chamatkar
2. Dil Aashna hai
3. King Uncle
4. Maya memsaab
5. Oh darling yeh hai India
6. Zamana Deewana
7. Guddu
8. English babu Desi mem
9. Ram jaane
10.Duplicate
11.Koyla
12.Trimurti
13.Anjaam
14.Army
15.Chahat
16.Dil se
17.Achanak
18.Baadshah
19.Phir bhi Dil hai hindustani
20.yeh lamhe hain judai ke
21.Dushman Duniya ka
22.Hey Ram
23.Josh
24.gaja gamini
25.One 2 ka four
26.Asoka
27.Hum Tumhare Hain Sanam
28.Gudgudee
29.Shakti-The power
30.Swades
31.Paheli
32.Silsilaay
33.Don
34.I see you
35.Krazzy4 (if u can incl JBJ, why not spe. appearances also)
Shahrukh Khan Om Shanti Om, Chak De India Shahrukh Khan still rules as both his releases Om Shanti Om and Chak De India are big blockbusters. Akshay Kumar has a never seen before year with four back to back clean hits including big blockbuster Welcome. Salman Khan delivers a blockbuster in Partner. Aamir Khan has the low budget Taare Zameen Par emerges a blockbuster in the long run.
Akshay Kumar Welcome, Bhool Bhulaiyaa, Heyy Babyy, Namastey London
Hrithik Roshan -
2006 Shahrukh Khan Don, Kabhi Alvida Na Kehna After becoming becoming the undisputed king with the start of the multiplex era in 2002, its now close at the top as Shahrukh Khan faces big competition from Hrithik Roshan who delivers two huge blockbusters in Dhoom 2 and Krrish. Aamir Khan also has two big hits. Approx Rumeration Shahrukh Khan/Hrithik Roshan-9 crore Aamir Khan-7 crore Akshay Kumar-6 crore
Hrithik Roshan Dhoom 2, Krrish
Aamir Khan Fanaa, Rang De Basanti
2005 Shahrukh Khan - Salman Khan has a great year with the blockbuster No Entry alongwith a major success in Maine Pyaar Kyun Kiya and a minor success in Lucky. Akshay Kumar has a good year with good successes including Garam Masala but its Overseas where his stock jumps and is second only to SRK with films like Bewafaa,Waqt,Garam Masala and Dosti.
Salman Khan No Entry, Maine Pyaar Kyun Kiya
Akshay Kumar Garam Masala, Waqt
2004 Shahrukh Khan Veer Zaara, Main Hoon Na Shahrukh Khan delivers a superhit in Veer Zaara and a hit in Main Hoon Na. Salman Khan proves his star power when the very average Garv takes a big opening His Mujhse Shaadi Karogi does well. Approx rumeration Shahrukh Khan-4 Crore Salman Khan-3 crore.
Salman Khan Mujhse Shaadi Karogi
Hrithik Roshan -
2003 Shahrukh Khan Kal Ho Na Ho, Chalte Chalte Hrithik Roshan makes a comeback with the superhit Koi Mil Gaya. Shahrukh Khan has two successes in Kal Ho Na Ho and Chalte Chalte. Salman Khan also makes a comeback with Tere Naam which although is not a big hit but it takes an amazing initial.
Hrithik Roshan Koi Mil Gaya
Salman Khan Tere Naam, Baghban
2002 Shahrukh Khan Devdas, Hum Tumhare Hain Sanam Sharhrukh Khan emerges the undisputed superstar after the huge grossers Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham(Dec 2001) and Devdas coupled with the interiors hit Hum Tumhare Hain Sanam which had been six years in the making.
Sunny Deol -
Aamir Khan -
2001 Sunny Deol Gadar Ek Prem Katha, Indian Sunny Deol makes a grand comeback with Gadar Ek Prem Katha which is the highest grossing film ever.His Indian also does well. Approx rumeration Sunny Deol-3.5 Crore Shahrukh Khan-3 crore Aamir Khan-2.5 crore
Shahrukh Khan Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham
Aamir Khan Lagaan
2000 Hrithik Roshan Kaho Naa Pyaar Hai, Mission Kashmir Hrithik Roshan becomes an overnight superstar with the blockbuster Kaho Naa Pyaar Hai.His subsequent releases disappoint after good initials. Amitabh Bachchan has his first outright hit after his comeback in 1997 with Mohabbatein.
Shahrukh Khan Mohabbatein, Josh
Salman Khan -
1999 Salman Khan Biwi No1, Hum Saath Saath Hain, Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam Salman Khan has a good year with three more successes including hit Biwi No1. Sanjay Dutt makes a comeback with films like Daag The Fire Haseena Maan Jayegi and Vaastav. Akshay Kumar makes a comback with Jaanwar. Approx rumeration Shahrukh Khan-2 crore Salman Khan-1.75 crore Sunny Deol/Aamir Khan-1.5 crore
Shahrukh Khan -
Aamir Khan Sarfarosh
1998 Shahrukh Khan Kuch Kuch Hota Hai Sunny Deol’s good run which includes four hits ends with Zor. Salman Khan scores big with many successes while Shahrukh Khan has the all time blockbuster Kuch Kuch Hota Hai. Bobby Deol emerges a star with Soldier.
Salman Khan Pyaar Kiya To Darna Kya, Bandhan, Jab Pyaar Kisise Hot Hai, Kuch Kuch Hota Hai
Sunny Deol -
1997 Sunny Deol Border, Ziddi Shahrukh Khan makes a comeback with films like Dil To Pagal Hai and Pardes and to a lesser extent Yes Boss. Sunny Deol adds two more big hits to his 1996 hits. Amitabh Bachchan’s comeback Mritydaata is a box office disasater.
Shahrukh Khan Dil To Pagal Hai, Pardes, Yes Boss
Aamir Khan Gupt, Ishq
1996 Aamir Khan Raja Hindustani Aamir Khan delivers a huge blockbuster with Raja Hindustani. Sunny Deol has two big hits with Ghatak and Jeet. Govinda is rock steady as Saajan Chale Sasural which repeats the super success of Coolie No1.
Sunny Deol Ghatak, Jeet
Govinda Saajan Chale Sasural
1995 Shahrukh Khan Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge, Karan Arjun Shahrukh Khan delivers huge megahits in Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge and Karan Arjun.Approx rumeration Shahrukh Khan-60 lakhs Sunny Deol-50 lakhs Salman Khan/Govinda 40 lakhs.
Salman Khan Karan Arjun
Govinda Coolie No1
1994 Shahrukh Khan - Shahrukh Khan hits the top as Sanjay Dutt is unavailable for films. Salman Khan makes a comeback with Hum Aapke Hain Hain which the highest grossing film ever. Mohra turns Akshay Kumar and Suniel Shetty into stars
Govinda Raja Babu
Akshay Kumar Mohra, Main Khiladi Tu Anari, Suhaag, Yeh Dillagi
1993 Sanjay Dutt Khalnayak Sanjay Dutt is unable to sign films due to personal problems. Shahrukh Khan becomes a star with hits like Baazigar and Darr. Govinda hits the top league with the all time blockbuster Aankhen.
Sunny Deol Darr, Damini, Lootere
Shahrukh Khan Darr, Baazigar
1992 Sanjay Dutt Adharm Sanjay Dutt hits the top after the retirement of Amitabh Bachchan. Khuda Gawah fails to make an impact at the box office for Amitabh Bachchan Shola Aur Shabnam makes Govinda a star after a lot of mid level success. Salman Khan sees many box office failures. Approx rumeration Sanjay Dutt-40 lakhs Sunny Deol-35 lakhs Anil Kapoor-30 lakhs.
Anil Kapoor Beta
Sunny Deol Vishwatma
1991 Amitabh Bachchan Hum Amitabh Bachchan announces his retirement from films. Sanjay Dutt hits the top league with the superhit Saajan and hit Sadak. Salman Khan also hits top league with Saajan and Sanam Bewafa. Phool aur Kaante makes Ajay Devgan a star.
Sanjay Dutt Saajan, Sadak
Salman Khan Saajan, Sanam Bewafa
1990 Amitabh Bachchan Aaj Ka Arjun Amitabh Bachchan delivers an outright hit after 5 years in Aaj Ka Arjun. Approx rumeration Amitabh Bachchan-60 lakhs Anil Kapoor-30 lakhs Sunny Deol-25 lakhs Jackie Shroff 20 lakhs
Anil Kapoor Kishen Kanhaiya, Ghar Ho To Aisa
Sunny Deol Ghayal
1989 Amitabh Bachchan - Anil Kapoor delivers back to back blockbusters with Ram Lakhan and Tezaab which released at the end of 1988. Sunny Deol and Jackie Shroff also make a big impact with many successes. The all time blockbuster Maine Pyar Kiya makes Salman Khan a star.
Anil Kapoor Ram Lakhan, Rakhwala, Eeshwar
Sunny Deol Tridev, Chaalbaaz, Vardi
1988 Amitabh Bachchan Shahenshah After spending time in politics,Amitabh Bachchan has a release in Shahenshah and the film succeeds due to its awesome initial. Aamir Khan becomes a star with Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak.
Mithun Chakraborty Waqt Ki Awaaz, Pyar Ka Mandir
Anil Kapoor Tezaab
1987 Amitabh Bachchan - Dharmendra makes a great comeback with the best year recorded by any star giving eight successes including major successes like Hukumat,Insaaniyat Ke Dushman,Aag Hi Aag and Loha. Vinod Khanna returns to films with the successful Insaaf.
Mithun Chakraborty Watan Ke Rakhwale
Dharmendra Hukumat, Aag Hi Aag, Loha, Insaaniyat Ke Dushman
1986 Amitabh Bachchan Aakhree Raasta Rishi Kapoor has a super hit in Nagina. Amitabh Bachchan’s Aakhree Raasta is an overall dissapointment as it does hit business only in Mumbai. Approx rumeration Amitabh Bachchan-60 lakhs Mithun Chakraborty-25 lakhs Jeetendra-20 lakhs Dharmendra -20 lakhs
Mithun Chakraborty Swarg Se Sunder, Dilwaala
Jeetendra Insaaf Ki Awaaz
1985 Amitabh Bachchan Mard, Geraftaar Amitabh Bachchan has Mard which is a superhit and Geraftaar which is a hit. Mithun Chakraborty hits the top league with the superhit Pyar Jhukta Nahin. Meri Jung makes Anil Kapoor a star.
Mithun Chakraborty Pyar Jhukta Nahin, Aandhi Toofan
Jeetendra Hoshiyaar
1984 Amitabh Bachchan Sharaabi Amitabh Bachchan has a hit in Sharaabi and a flop in Inquilaab. Jeetendra scores with Tohfa and Maqsad. Dharmendra has a good success in Jeene Nahin Doonga and moderate successes in Jaagir and Dharam aur Kanoon.
Jeetendra Tohfa, Maqsad
Dharmendra Jeene Nahin Doonga, Jaagir, Dharam Aur Kanoon
1983 Amitabh Bachchan Coolie, Andhaa Kanoon Amitabh Bachchan has the big hit Coolie while Rajesh Khanna has big hits after 9 years with Avtar and Souten. Jeetendra is strong with many successful films. Sunny Deol and Jackie Shroff become stars with Betaab and Hero respectively.
Jeetendra Himmatwala, Mawaali, Justice Chaudhury, Jaanidost
Dharmendra Nauker Biwi Ka, Jaanidost
1982 Amitabh Bachchan Namak Halaal, Khuddaar, Satte Pe Satta Disco Dancer makes Mithun Chakraborty a star. Jeetendra’s home production Deedar E Yaar is one of the biggest box office disasters of all time but his other releases do well. Approx rumeration Amitabh Bachchan-50 lakhs Dharmendra-30 lakhs Jeetendra-25 lakhs Mithun Chakraborty-15 lakhs
Dharmendra Ghazab, Bhagavat, Teesri Aankh
Jeetendra Farz Aur Kanoon, Jeeo Aur Jeene Do, Dharam Kanta
1981 Amitabh Bachchan Lawaaris, Naseeb, Kaalia, Yaarana Amitabh Bachchan hits his peak with Naseeb and Lawaaris being big grossers and Kaalia and Yaarana doing pretty well. Dilip Kumar returns after four years in Kranti and the film is a huge blockbuster. Kumar Gaurav and Kamal Hassan become stars with the superhits Love Story and Ek Duje Ke Liye respectively.
Dharmendra Kaatilon Ke Kaatil
Jeetendra Meri Awaaz Suno, Ek Hi Bhool
1980 Amitabh Bachchan Dostana, Ram Balram Jeetendra makes a comeback with four successes including the biggest hit of the year Aasha and two more outright hits in Jyoti Bane Jwala and Maang Bharo Sajna. Rajesh Khanna has a major success after six years in Thodisi Bewafaii.
Dharmendra Ram Balram, Ali Baba Aur 40 Chor, Chunaoti
Jeetendra Aasha, Jyoti Bane Jwala, Judaai, Maang Bharo Sajna
1979 Amitabh Bachchan Suhaag, Mr Natwarlal Vinod Khanna shocks the industry as he announces he will leave films after his current assignments. Approx rumeration Amitabh Bachchan-35 lakhs Dharmendra-30 lakhs Vinod Khanna-20 lakhs Jeetendra-15 lakhs.
Dharmendra Kartavya
Vinod Khanna -
1978 Amitabh Bachchan Muqaddar Ka Sikander Trishul, Don, Kasme Vaade, Ganga Ki Saugandh Amitabh Bachchan becomes the undisputed No1 as he has his best year yet with many successes including two superhits in Muqaddar Ka Sikander and Trishul.
Dharmendra Azaad, Phandebaaz
Vinod Khanna Muqaddar Ka Sikander, Main Tulsi Tere Aangan Ki, Daku Aur Jawan
1977 Amitabh Bachchan Amar Akbar Anthony, Parvarish, Khoon Pasina, Adaalat Amitabh Bachchan has a great year. Dharmendra is rock steady. Vinod Khanna hits the top league with many successes. Approx rumeration Amitabh Bachchan-25 lakhs Dharmendra-25 lakhs Rajesh Khanna 15 lakhs Vinod Khanna 12 lakhs.
Dharmendra Dharam Veer, Chacha Bhatija, Khel Khiladi Ka, Dream Girl
Vinod Khanna Amar Akbar Anthony, Dharam Veer, Parvarish, Adaalat
1976 Amitabh Bachchan Hera Pheri, Kabhi Kabhi, Do Anjaane Amitabh Bachchan goes to the top as the successes pile up. Vinod Khanna is a star with Hera Pheri and Haath Ki Safaai while Shatrughan Sinha is a star with Kaalicharan. Manoj Kumar creates history by giving 3 back to back blockbusters with Dus Numbri.
Dharmendra Charas, Maa
Manoj Kumar Dus Numbri
1975 Dharmendra Sholay, Pratiggya, Chupke Chupke The hits flow for Dharmendra and Amitabh Bachchan including Sholay which breaks all box office records to become the highest grossing film ever. Manoj Kumar has another superhit in Sanyasi after Roti Kapada Aur Makaan
Amitabh Bachchan Sholay, Deewaar, Chupke Chupke
Manoj Kumar Sanyasi
Learn to say things in an effective manner. Long post and long essay don’t mean much. Please do not let you inability become our burden. Seems like because you cannot impress us with substance you are trying to baffle us with bullshit.
Also this is not your http://www.NaachGaoAurJhootBolo.com hence don’t try to slip and slide on the basis of semantics. DVD has not as available as it is today during the early days of SRK but Videos were. The curse of piracy existed (PERIOD). This was not the case during the entire Bachchalan era (days, maybe months, perhaps the two years when he was on top). Big B had it easy because of lack of Piracy and lack of competition from Cable and Internet. Today when without doubt DVD (& Videos), Internet et al are making a dent, nonetheless SRK remain unhindered, he is the Don.
is not easy for Big B these days. Unfortunately He is old and dilapidated. Watching him today is like seeing an old lame horse struggle to cross the finish line. I am concerned that after his enthusiastic Yeast Mambo in JBJ he might need a hip replacement. I am more concerned that Johnny Depp might subject him to some rough prostrate rub in Mira Nair’s Shantaram. Trust me Satyam I am with you bro, I feel your pain.
an actor in Bollywood who was active and popular at 65. Well I wonder . Well fat boy, at around 65 Dilip Kumar made the very popular Karma. At 69 he made Saudagar (all shows sold out for the first week, compare that to 10% audience for Nisabdh).
BTW when did Filmfare became the magazine of record for
FANTASTIC JOB DONE NISHIT….MIND BLOWING!!!
in d above article u can count how many times srk name appears 14 and Big B’s 18 dis list is down d yrs biggest actors yr by yr
thanx arun thanx mate
Learn to say things in an effective manner. Long post and long essay don’t mean much. Please do not let you inability become our burden. Seems like because you cannot impress us with substance you are trying to baffle us with bullshit.
Also this is not your NaachGaoAurJhootBolo hence don’t try to slip and slide on the basis of semantics. DVD has not as available as it is today during the early days of SRK but Videos were. The curse of piracy existed (PERIOD). This was not the case during the entire Bachchalan era (days, maybe months, perhaps the two years when he was on top). Big B had it easy because of lack of Piracy and lack of competition from Cable and Internet. Today when without doubt DVD (& Videos), Internet et al are making a dent, nonetheless SRK remain unhindered, he is the Don.
is not easy for Big B these days. Unfortunately He is old and dilapidated. Watching him today is like seeing an old lame horse struggle to cross the finish line. I am concerned that after his enthusiastic Yeast Mambo in JBJ he might need a hip replacement. I am more concerned that Johnny Depp might subject him to some rough prostrate rub in Mira Nair’s Shantaram. Trust me Satyam I am with you bro, I feel your pain.
an actor in Bollywood who was active and popular at 65. Well I wonder . Well fat boy, at around 65 Dilip Kumar made the very popular Karma. At 69 he made Saudagar (all shows sold out for the first week, compare that to 10% audience for Nisabdh).
BTW when did Filmfare became the magazine of record for
Arun bro i copied it and pasted it from box office india and dis lame duck kamran is still not beleiving???
plus mate i lke big posts bcoz iam Big B’s fan not a dogs fan
urs Woh malhein hai judadi ke srk and raveena was biggest disaster its earning is less den sat of rgv’s aag???bol figures present karoon??/
Kamran,
So u say lon posts do not serve the purpose….Yeah..and what abt u pasting same posts again and again without any proof…That itself is a height of stupidity…as if u have run over on words….
yaar Arun i think rajeev has some knowlege but rest of dem are trying to be like barkhaa dutt quick way to TOP ..
Let us start at the very beginning. The argument has faulty construction. The author talks about “plunging Hollywood revenue”, how does the author define a plunge, by a 5% swing? Where is the statistics to support this view? Or the view that comparatively Bollywood did better? The author it appears is making unsubstantiated wild statements that are devoid of reality just so as to suit his cock and bull story. Given that the creditability of the author and the integrity of the post are lost at the set-up stage (i.e. the set up of the argument/position) itself, it is hard to take anything being said in the post on its face value. This post is dead on arrival.
It has been said that even the Devil can quote the Bible to suit his purposes. I think the author is being the devil in the post we are trying to evaluate. Nahta’s statements are being cherry picked, some misrepresented and still others are factually incorrect. Hence for the purpose of verification, we urge the author to provide links to Nahtas statements. Without verification we cannot accept them as Nahta’s statements. Furthermore we need all of Nahta’s statements relating to the year in question or at least a statistically valid representation, we cannot narrowly focus on a few cherry picked & unverified statements and conclude what Nahta’s complete or comprehensive view for the year 2005 is. Hence short of the additional info being sought, references from Nahta on this issue are null and void, i.e. inadmissible. For all we know these may not be Nahta’s position or equally likely it is possible that when all of Nahta’s statements are evaluated his position may just be the opposite.
Frankly at this stage it seems not worth while to go any further, but this article is such a piece of dog carp that it would be irresponsible not to point out that without any hard numbers for suport, it is being claimed in this post that no actor has done what Bachchan achieved in the year 2005. The author should be reminded that without real numbers it is impossible to compare in subjective terms. This statement can therefore just be called a hyperbole. In other words, pure baloney.
Furthermore in a Bachchanista like zeal, the author lies (a standard trait of Bachchanistas) that never has a script been written for a man of Big B’s age. Thankfully Vidhata, Saudagar and Baghban (a film written for Dilip Kumar but passed down to Big B because of DK’s health problems) etc expose these lies. Why just DK, even Ashok Kumar had scripts written for him during his third innings (e.g. Ashirwad). One wonders how pathetic Big B’s record has to be in order for the Bachchanistas to lie to make him look decent.
Finally as is always the case, semi-hit movies have been shamlesly re-classified as hit to fit the narrative, or a Askshay Kumar hit is re-classified as a Big B hit.Come on, on the issue of salability does anyone have to give any satistics anymore to show Big B’s poor showing ? Has anyone forgotten Dil Jo Kahay, Virudh and Ek Ajnabee ? Might I add all from the same year 2005. Let me remind you that with the sun, moon and the stars aligned in his favor. With the attention of the entire country and the media focused on him. With a tailor made role in a relatively well made movie, Big B failed to save Ek Ajnabee from flopping at the box office
San
Let us start at the very beginning. The argument has faulty construction. The author talks about “plunging Hollywood revenue”, how does the author define a plunge, by a 5% swing? Where is the statistics to support this view? Or the view that comparatively Bollywood did better? The author it appears is making unsubstantiated wild statements that are devoid of reality just so as to suit his cock and bull story. Given that the creditability of the author and the integrity of the post are lost at the set-up stage (i.e. the set up of the argument/position) itself, it is hard to take anything being said in the post on its face value. This post is dead on arrival.
It has been said that even the Devil can quote the Bible to suit his purposes. I think the author is being the devil in the post we are trying to evaluate. Nahta’s statements are being cherry picked, some misrepresented and still others are factually incorrect. Hence for the purpose of verification, we urge the author to provide links to Nahtas statements. Without verification we cannot accept them as Nahta’s statements. Furthermore we need all of Nahta’s statements relating to the year in question or at least a statistically valid representation, we cannot narrowly focus on a few cherry picked & unverified statements and conclude what Nahta’s complete or comprehensive view for the year 2005 is. Hence short of the additional info being sought, references from Nahta on this issue are null and void, i.e. inadmissible. For all we know these may not be Nahta’s position or equally likely it is possible that when all of Nahta’s statements are evaluated his position may just be the opposite.
Frankly at this stage it seems not worth while to go any further, but this article is such a piece of dog carp that it would be irresponsible not to point out that without any hard numbers for suport, it is being claimed in this post that no actor has done what Bachchan achieved in the year 2005. The author should be reminded that without real numbers it is impossible to compare in subjective terms. This statement can therefore just be called a hyperbole. In other words, pure baloney.
Furthermore in a Bachchanista like zeal, the author lies (a standard trait of Bachchanistas) that never has a script been written for a man of Big B’s age. Thankfully Vidhata, Saudagar and Baghban (a film written for Dilip Kumar but passed down to Big B because of DK’s health problems) etc expose these lies. Why just DK, even Ashok Kumar had scripts written for him during his third innings (e.g. Ashirwad). One wonders how pathetic Big B’s record has to be in order for the Bachchanistas to lie to make him look decent.
Finally as is always the case, semi-hit movies have been shamlesly re-classified as hit to fit the narrative, or a Askshay Kumar hit is re-classified as a Big B hit.Come on, on the issue of salability does anyone have to give any satistics anymore to show Big B’s poor showing ? Has anyone forgotten Dil Jo Kahay, Virudh and Ek Ajnabee ? Might I add all from the same year 2005. Let me remind you that with the sun, moon and the stars aligned in his favor. With the attention of the entire country and the media focused on him. With a tailor made role in a relatively well made movie, Big B failed to save Ek Ajnabee from flopping at the box officeSan
Let us start at the very beginning. The argument has faulty construction. The author talks about “plunging Hollywood revenue”, how does the author define a plunge, by a 5% swing? Where is the statistics to support this view? Or the view that comparatively Bollywood did better? The author it appears is making unsubstantiated wild statements that are devoid of reality just so as to suit his cock and bull story. Given that the creditability of the author and the integrity of the post are lost at the set-up stage (i.e. the set up of the argument/position) itself, it is hard to take anything being said in the post on its face value. This post is dead on arrival.
It has been said that even the Devil can quote the Bible to suit his purposes. I think the author is being the devil in the post we are trying to evaluate. Nahta’s statements are being cherry picked, some misrepresented and still others are factually incorrect. Hence for the purpose of verification, we urge the author to provide links to Nahtas statements. Without verification we cannot accept them as Nahta’s statements. Furthermore we need all of Nahta’s statements relating to the year in question or at least a statistically valid representation, we cannot narrowly focus on a few cherry picked & unverified statements and conclude what Nahta’s complete or comprehensive view for the year 2005 is. Hence short of the additional info being sought, references from Nahta on this issue are null and void, i.e. inadmissible. For all we know these may not be Nahta’s position or equally likely it is possible that when all of Nahta’s statements are evaluated his position may just be the opposite.
Frankly at this stage it seems not worth while to go any further, but this article is such a piece of dog carp that it would be irresponsible not to point out that without any hard numbers for suport, it is being claimed in this post that no actor has done what Bachchan achieved in the year 2005. The author should be reminded that without real numbers it is impossible to compare in subjective terms. This statement can therefore just be called a hyperbole. In other words, pure baloney.
Furthermore in a Bachchanista like zeal, the author lies (a standard trait of Bachchanistas) that never has a script been written for a man of Big B’s age. Thankfully Vidhata, Saudagar and Baghban (a film written for Dilip Kumar but passed down to Big B because of DK’s health problems) etc expose these lies. Why just DK, even Ashok Kumar had scripts written for him during his third innings (e.g. Ashirwad). One wonders how pathetic Big B’s record has to be in order for the Bachchanistas to lie to make him look decent.
Finally as is always the case, semi-hit movies have been shamlesly re-classified as hit to fit the narrative, or a Askshay Kumar hit is re-classified as a Big B hit.Come on, on the issue of salability does anyone have to give any satistics anymore to show Big B’s poor showing ? Has anyone forgotten Dil Jo Kahay, Virudh and Ek Ajnabee ? Might I add all from the same year 2005. Let me remind you that with the sun, moon and the stars aligned in his favor. With the attention of the entire country and the media focused on him. With a tailor made role in a relatively well made movie, Big B failed to save Ek Ajnabee from flopping at the box office
Kabhi Kabhie (English: Sometimes…) is a 1976 Hindi movie, produced and directed by Yash Chopra, starring Waheeda Rehman, Shashi Kapoor, Amitabh Bachchan, Raakhee Gulzar, Neetu Singh and Rishi Kapoor. This was Yash Chopra’s second directorial film with Amitabh Bachchan and Shashi Kapoor in the lead roles after Deewar. The movie was a great commercial success with excellent performances and haunting music by Khayyam.
bhai kabhie kabhie toh hit thie tu flop bata raha hai???
bhai kamraan tu anand ko flop bata raha hai
Anand (Hindi: आनंद, Urdu: آنند) is a Hindi[1] movie written and directed by Hrishikesh Mukherjee and released in 1970. It starred Amitabh Bachchan and Rajesh Khanna. The film was both a critical and commercial success. Considered as one of the greatest movies of all time, this film beautifully captures some of the greatest philosophies of life. The dialogue of the film was written by the acclaimed poet and writer Gulzar.
Indiatimes Movies ranks the movie amongst the Top 25 Must See Bollywood Films [
kamran great job
they have no prrof
they r looser so from tommoroww
they r blocked looser
posting the long comments and they made burden on us
so today is there last day
from tommorow they r bocked
they r looser
amitab dhoodwala
dhood ka dhood aur pani ka pani hogaya hai
Kamran has gone insane…He is trying to distort facts….Did u get ur injections on time kamran?
aur jai tu kuttawaala srk kutta waala
Jai,
U can ban from today itelf for all i care since this forum has always been SRK aided….No facts, no relvance at all. What’s the point in arguing with u all frogs who think there in no world beyond this well….Go to hell!!!
dar gaya tabhie block karega hahahaha ja bacchey kar ley kitno ko karega duniya mein har jagah ek arun aur ek nishit mill jayega BIG B is legend not a dog
Go and see the kind ogf hist BIG B blogs are getting.. Its already super duper hit in the blogosphere….Has surpassed Aamir’s blogs also….
Kuen se bahar nikli mandakon!!!
arun mate dis time ur wrong in 4 paagalo ko Krazzy 4 ko kasiey chodh dega tu …dont leave dem ….yeh srk ke ghar tak chale jayengey uska gun gaatey hue
today is there last day
aur question r going useless they have no guts to answer our questions so today is there last day
they r useless and loosers like amitab
they rmaking burden on us by posting long comment which do not have any base
arey dey think dey r champs dey dont know wat real filmdom is sseing aamirs profile from last 11 yrs aamir has given 11 hits and 3 flops so dat makes him a good contender for number position among khans ( Big as a said is beyond dis he is legend ) and akshays record is impressive to
Let us start at the very beginning. The argument has faulty construction. The author talks about “plunging Hollywood revenue”, how does the author define a plunge, by a 5% swing? Where is the statistics to support this view? Or the view that comparatively Bollywood did better? The author it appears is making unsubstantiated wild statements that are devoid of reality just so as to suit his cock and bull story. Given that the creditability of the author and the integrity of the post are lost at the set-up stage (i.e. the set up of the Let us start at the very beginning. The argument has faulty construction. The author talks about “plunging Hollywood revenue”, how does the author define a plunge, by a 5% swing? Where is the statistics to support this view? Or the view that comparatively Bollywood did better? The author it appears is making unsubstantiated wild statements that are devoid of reality just so as to suit his cock and bull story. Given that the creditability of the author and the integrity of the post are lost at the set-up stage (i.e. the set up of the argument/position) itself, it is hard to take anything being said in the post on its face value. This post is dead on arrival.
It has been said that even the Devil can quote the Bible to suit his purposes. I think the author is being the devil in the post we are trying to evaluate. Nahta’s statements are being cherry picked, some misrepresented and still others are factually incorrect. Hence for the purpose of verification, we urge the author to provide links to Nahtas statements. Without verification we cannot accept them as Nahta’s statements. Furthermore we need all of Nahta’s statements relating to the year in question or at least a statistically valid representation, we cannot narrowly focus on a few cherry picked & unverified statements and conclude what Nahta’s complete or comprehensive view for the year 2005 is. Hence short of the additional info being sought, references from Nahta on this issue are null and void, i.e. inadmissible. For all we know these may not be Nahta’s position or equally likely it is possible that when all of Nahta’s statements are evaluated his position may just be the opposite.
Frankly at this stage it seems not worth while to go any further, but this article is such a piece of dog carp that it would be irresponsible not to point out that without any hard numbers for suport, it is being claimed in this post that no actor has done what Bachchan achieved in the year 2005. The author should be reminded that without real numbers it is impossible to compare in subjective terms. This statement can therefore just be called a hyperbole. In other words, pure baloney.
Furthermore in a Bachchanista like zeal, the author lies (a standard trait of Bachchanistas) that never has a script been written for a man of Big B’s age. Thankfully Vidhata, Saudagar and Baghban (a film written for Dilip Kumar but passed down to Big B because of DK’s health problems) etc expose these lies. Why just DK, even Ashok Kumar had scripts written for him during his third innings (e.g. Ashirwad). One wonders how pathetic Big B’s record has to be in order for the Bachchanistas to lie to make him look decent.
Finally as is always the case, semi-hit movies have been shamlesly re-classified as hit to fit the narrative, or a Askshay Kumar hit is re-classified as a Big B hit.Come on, on the issue of salability does anyone have to give any satistics anymore to show Big B’s poor showing ? Has anyone forgotten Dil Jo Kahay, Virudh and Ek Ajnabee ? Might I add all from the same year 2005. Let me remind you that with the sun, moon and the stars aligned in his favor. With the attention of the entire country and the media focused on him. With a tailor made role in a relatively well made movie, Big B failed to save Ek Ajnabee from flopping at the box office
San
Let us start at the very beginning. The argument has faulty construction. The author talks about “plunging Hollywood revenue”, how does the author define a plunge, by a 5% swing? Where is the statistics to support this view? Or the view that comparatively Bollywood did better? The author it appears is making unsubstantiated wild statements that are devoid of reality just so as to suit his cock and bull story. Given that the creditability of the author and the integrity of the post are lost at the set-up stage (i.e. the set up of the argument/position) itself, it is hard to take anything being said in the post on its face value. This post is dead on arrival.
It has been said that even the Devil can quote the Bible to suit his purposes. I think the author is being the devil in the post we are trying to evaluate. Nahta’s statements are being cherry picked, some misrepresented and still others are factually incorrect. Hence for the purpose of verification, we urge the author to provide links to Nahtas statements. Without verification we cannot accept them as Nahta’s statements. Furthermore we need all of Nahta’s statements relating to the year in question or at least a statistically valid representation, we cannot narrowly focus on a few cherry picked & unverified statements and conclude what Nahta’s complete or comprehensive view for the year 2005 is. Hence short of the additional info being sought, references from Nahta on this issue are null and void, i.e. inadmissible. For all we know these may not be Nahta’s position or equally likely it is possible that when all of Nahta’s statements are evaluated his position may just be the opposite.
Frankly at this stage it seems not worth while to go any further, but this article is such a piece of dog carp that it would be irresponsible not to point out that without any hard numbers for suport, it is being claimed in this post that no actor has done what Bachchan achieved in the year 2005. The author should be reminded that without real numbers it is impossible to compare in subjective terms. This statement can therefore just be called a hyperbole. In other words, pure baloney.
Furthermore in a Bachchanista like zeal, the author lies (a standard trait of Bachchanistas) that never has a script been written for a man of Big B’s age. Thankfully Vidhata, Saudagar and Baghban (a film written for Dilip Kumar but passed down to Big B because of DK’s health problems) etc expose these lies. Why just DK, even Ashok Kumar had scripts written for him during his third innings (e.g. Ashirwad). One wonders how pathetic Big B’s record has to be in order for the Bachchanistas to lie to make him look decent.
Finally as is always the case, semi-hit movies have been shamlesly re-classified as hit to fit the narrative, or a Askshay Kumar hit is re-classified as a Big B hit.Come on, on the issue of salability does anyone have to give any satistics anymore to show Big B’s poor showing ? Has anyone forgotten Dil Jo Kahay, Virudh and Ek Ajnabee ? Might I add all from the same year 2005. Let me remind you that with the sun, moon and the stars aligned in his favor. With the attention of the entire country and the media focused on him. With a tailor made role in a relatively well made movie, Big B failed to save Ek Ajnabee from flopping at the box officeSan
Let us start at the very beginning. The argument has faulty construction. The author talks about “plunging Hollywood revenue”, how does the author define a plunge, by a 5% swing? Where is the statistics to support this view? Or the view that comparatively Bollywood did better? The author it appears is making unsubstantiated wild statements that are devoid of reality just so as to suit his cock and bull story. Given that the creditability of the author and the integrity of the post are lost at the set-up stage (i.e. the set up of the argument/position) itself, it is hard to take anything being said in the post on its face value. This post is dead on arrival.
It has been said that even the Devil can quote the Bible to suit his purposes. I think the author is being the devil in the post we are trying to evaluate. Nahta’s statements are being cherry picked, some misrepresented and still others are factually incorrect. Hence for the purpose of verification, we urge the author to provide links to Nahtas statements. Without verification we cannot accept them as Nahta’s statements. Furthermore we need all of Nahta’s statements relating to the year in question or at least a statistically valid representation, we cannot narrowly focus on a few cherry picked & unverified statements and conclude what Nahta’s complete or comprehensive view for the year 2005 is. Hence short of the additional info being sought, references from Nahta on this issue are null and void, i.e. inadmissible. For all we know these may not be Nahta’s position or equally likely it is possible that when all of Nahta’s statements are evaluated his position may just be the opposite.
Frankly at this stage it seems not worth while to go any further, but this article is such a piece of dog carp that it would be irresponsible not to point out that without any hard numbers for suport, it is being claimed in this post that no actor has done what Bachchan achieved in the year 2005. The author should be reminded that without real numbers it is impossible to compare in subjective terms. This statement can therefore just be called a hyperbole. In other words, pure baloney.
Furthermore in a Bachchanista like zeal, the author lies (a standard trait of Bachchanistas) that never has a script been written for a man of Big B’s age. Thankfully Vidhata, Saudagar and Baghban (a film written for Dilip Kumar but passed down to Big B because of DK’s health problems) etc expose these lies. Why just DK, even Ashok Kumar had scripts written for him during his third innings (e.g. Ashirwad). One wonders how pathetic Big B’s record has to be in order for the Bachchanistas to lie to make him look decent.
Finally as is always the case, semi-hit movies have been shamlesly re-classified as hit to fit the narrative, or a Askshay Kumar hit is re-classified as a Big B hit.Come on, on the issue of salability does anyone have to give any satistics anymore to show Big B’s poor showing ? Has anyone forgotten Dil Jo Kahay, Virudh and Ek Ajnabee ? Might I add all from the same year 2005. Let me remind you that with the sun, moon and the stars aligned in his favor. With the attention of the entire country and the media focused on him. With a tailor made role in a relatively well made movie, Big B failed to save Ek Let us start at the very beginning. The argument has faulty construction. The author talks about “plunging Hollywood revenue”, how does the author define a plunge, by a 5% swing? Where is the statistics to support this view? Or the view that comparatively Bollywood did better? The author it appears is making unsubstantiated wild statements that are devoid of reality just so as to suit his cock and bull story. Given that the creditability of the author and the integrity of the post are lost at the set-up stage (i.e. the set up of the argument/position) itself, it is hard to take anything being said in the post on its face value. This post is dead on arrival.
It has been said that even the Devil can quote the Bible to suit his purposes. I think the author is being the devil in the post we are trying to evaluate. Nahta’s statements are being cherry picked, some misrepresented and still others are factually incorrect. Hence for the purpose of verification, we urge the author to provide links to Nahtas statements. Without verification we cannot accept them as Nahta’s statements. Furthermore we need all of Nahta’s statements relating to the year in question or at least a statistically valid representation, we cannot narrowly focus on a few cherry picked & unverified statements and conclude what Nahta’s complete or comprehensive view for the year 2005 is. Hence short of the additional info being sought, references from Nahta on this issue are null and void, i.e. inadmissible. For all we know these may not be Nahta’s position or equally likely it is possible that when all of Nahta’s statements are evaluated his position may just be the opposite.
Frankly at this stage it seems not worth while to go any further, but this article is such a piece of dog carp that it would be irresponsible not to point out that without any hard numbers for suport, it is being claimed in this post that no actor has done what Bachchan achieved in the year 2005. The author should be reminded that without real numbers it is impossible to compare in subjective terms. This statement can therefore just be called a hyperbole. In other words, pure baloney.
Furthermore in a Bachchanista like zeal, the author lies (a standard trait of Bachchanistas) that never has a script been written for a man of Big B’s age. Thankfully Vidhata, Saudagar and Baghban (a film written for Dilip Kumar but passed down to Big B because of DK’s health problems) etc expose these lies. Why just DK, even Ashok Kumar had scripts written for him during his third innings (e.g. Ashirwad). One wonders how pathetic Big B’s record has to be in order for the Bachchanistas to lie to make him look decent.
Finally as is always the case, semi-hit movies have been shamlesly re-classified as hit to fit the narrative, or a Askshay Kumar hit is re-classified as a Big B hit.Come on, on the issue of salability does anyone have to give any satistics anymore to show Big B’s poor showing ? Has anyone forgotten Dil Jo Kahay, Virudh and Ek Ajnabee ? Might I add all from the same year 2005. Let me remind you that with the sun, moon and the stars aligned in his favor. With the attention of the entire country and the media focused on him. With a tailor made role in a relatively well made movie, Big B failed to save Ek Ajnabee from flopping at the box office
San
Let us start at the very beginning. The argument has faulty construction. The author talks about “plunging Hollywood revenue”, how does the author define a plunge, by a 5% swing? Where is the statistics to support this view? Or the view that comparatively Bollywood did better? The author it appears is making unsubstantiated wild statements that are devoid of reality just so as to suit his cock and bull story. Given that the creditability of the author and the integrity of the post are lost at the set-up stage (i.e. the set up of the argument/position) itself, it is hard to take anything being said in the post on its face value. This post is dead on arrival.
It has been said that even the Devil can quote the Bible to suit his purposes. I think the author is being the devil in the post we are trying to evaluate. Nahta’s statements are being cherry picked, some misrepresented and still others are factually incorrect. Hence for the purpose of verification, we urge the author to provide links to Nahtas statements. Without verification we cannot accept them as Nahta’s statements. Furthermore we need all of Nahta’s statements relating to the year in question or at least a statistically valid representation, we cannot narrowly focus on a few cherry picked & unverified statements and conclude what Nahta’s complete or comprehensive view for the year 2005 is. Hence short of the additional info being sought, references from Nahta on this issue are null and void, i.e. inadmissible. For all we know these may not be Nahta’s position or equally likely it is possible that when all of Nahta’s statements are evaluated his position may just be the opposite.
Frankly at this stage it seems not worth while to go any further, but this article is such a piece of dog carp that it would be irresponsible not to point out that without any hard numbers for suport, it is being claimed in this post that no actor has done what Bachchan achieved in the year 2005. The author should be reminded that without real numbers it is impossible to compare in subjective terms. This statement can therefore just be called a hyperbole. In other words, pure baloney.
Furthermore in a Bachchanista like zeal, the author lies (a standard trait of Bachchanistas) that never has a script been written for a man of Big B’s age. Thankfully Vidhata, Saudagar and Baghban (a film written for Dilip Kumar but passed down to Big B because of DK’s health problems) etc expose these lies. Why just DK, even Ashok Kumar had scripts written for him during his third innings (e.g. Ashirwad). One wonders how pathetic Big B’s record has to be in order for the Bachchanistas to lie to make him look decent.
Finally as is always the case, semi-hit movies have been shamlesly re-classified as hit to fit the narrative, or a Askshay Kumar hit is re-classified as a Big B hit.Come on, on the issue of salability does anyone have to give any satistics anymore to show Big B’s poor showing ? Has anyone forgotten Dil Jo Kahay, Virudh and Ek Ajnabee ? Might I add all from the same year 2005. Let me remind you that with the sun, moon and the stars aligned in his favor. With the attention of the entire country and the media focused on him. With a tailor made role in a relatively well made movie, Big B failed to save Ek Ajnabee from flopping at the box officeSan
Let us start at the very beginning. The argument has faulty construction. The author talks about “plunging Hollywood revenue”, how does the author define a plunge, by a 5% swing? Where is the statistics to support this view? Or the view that comparatively Bollywood did better? The author it appears is making unsubstantiated wild statements that are devoid of reality just so as to suit his cock and bull story. Given that the creditability of the author and the integrity of the post are lost at the set-up stage (i.e. the set up of the argument/position) itself, it is hard to take anything being said in the post on its face value. This post is dead on arrival.
It has been said that even the Devil can quote the Bible to suit his purposes. I think the author is being the devil in the post we are trying to evaluate. Nahta’s statements are being cherry picked, some misrepresented and still others are factually incorrect. Hence for the purpose of verification, we urge the author to provide links to Nahtas statements. Without verification we cannot accept them as Nahta’s statements. Furthermore we need all of Nahta’s statements relating to the year in question or at least a statistically valid representation, we cannot narrowly focus on a few cherry picked & unverified statements and conclude what Nahta’s complete or comprehensive view for the year 2005 is. Hence short of the additional info being sought, references from Nahta on this issue are null and void, i.e. inadmissible. For all we know these may not be Nahta’s position or equally likely it is possible that when all of Nahta’s statements are evaluated his position may just be the opposite.
Frankly at this stage it seems not worth while to go any further, but this article is such a piece of dog carp that it would be irresponsible not to point out that without any hard numbers for suport, it is being claimed in this post that no actor has done what Bachchan achieved in the year 2005. The author should be reminded that without real numbers it is impossible to compare in subjective terms. This statement can therefore just be called a hyperbole. In other words, pure baloney.
Furthermore in a Bachchanista like zeal, the author lies (a standard trait of Bachchanistas) that never has a script been written for a man of Big B’s age. Thankfully Vidhata, Saudagar and Baghban (a film written for Dilip Kumar but passed down to Big B because of DK’s health problems) etc expose these lies. Why just DK, even Ashok Kumar had scripts written for him during his third innings (e.g. Ashirwad). One wonders how pathetic Big B’s record has to be in order for the Bachchanistas to lie to make him look decent.
Finally as is always the case, semi-hit movies have been shamlesly re-classified as hit to fit the narrative, or a Askshay Kumar hit is re-classified as a Big B hit.Come on, on the issue of salability does anyone have to give any satistics anymore to show Big B’s poor showing ? Has anyone forgotten Dil Jo Kahay, Virudh and Ek Ajnabee ? Might I add all from the same year 2005. Let me remind you that with the sun, moon and the stars aligned in his favor. With the attention of the entire country and the media focused on him. With a tailor made role Let us start at the very beginning. The argument has faulty construction. The author talks about “plunging Hollywood revenue”, how does the author define a plunge, by a 5% swing? Where is the statistics to support this view? Or the view that comparatively Bollywood did better? The author it appears is making unsubstantiated wild statements that are devoid of reality just so as to suit his cock and bull story. Given that the creditability of the author and the integrity of the post are lost at the set-up stage (i.e. the set up of the argument/position) itself, it is hard to t