Jodha Akbar : Something is rotten in the State of Denmark

Link

At my grade school I still hold the records in sports, in studies and yes in punishment. Had it not been for the fact that I was a very good student, and very good at sports, I would have been thrown out of the school. Yes, I was a mischievous kid (responsible, and capable, but slightly mischievous). Walking out of Jodha Akbar (“JA”), I saw all the punishment I had suffered at school flash in front of my eyes (that was the effect of JA on me). Sitting through JA is worse than any punishment, apart from that being an insult to one’s intelligence. The problem is not just that JA is very long, yes, the length of Jodha Akbar is a problem, that being said let us recognize that there are many movies that are long and simultaneously wonderful. The problem with JA is that it is at least three movies at conflict with each other. Sadly the parts do not work like the diverse components of an orchestra to produce sweet music, instead they work against each other for attention and therefore prevent the audience to get completely vested.

Alejandro González Iñárritu has made a couple of movies with diverse sub plots where the sum of the parts is greater than the whole (e.g. Amores Perros). Closer to Bollywood, Anurag Base also has used such a narrative format in Life in a Metro (lesser quality and technique than Alejandro’s works but definitely good). The rich content of Jodha Akbar that aSHITtos GAWAARikar (“AG”) wanted to regale us with demanded an Alejandro like treatment, hence the first & foremost structural mistake that AG made was that he used a narrative format that does not suit the richness of Jodha Akbar. Regardless of anything, on account of the narrative structure, the outcome was doomed to be dull & boring.

Having committed himself to a boring narrative style (this is not a statement against linear story telling) for his rich content, AG should have at the very least made the i) Political Intrigue, and the ii) Domestic Household Squabbles, subservient to the romance between Jodha and Akbar. That would have provided a central arc which the audience could have got themselves vested to. Unfortunately, AG gives all the sub plots equal attention and thereby compounds the error in the Jodha Akbar’s narration. It is therefore not at all surprising that JA is not finding any traction with the audience.

Without doubt the romance plot works the best, but this is just relatively speaking. The fact is that the various plots are handled so poorly that in comparison the romance plot seems good, feels almost like a relief. Nonetheless, when taken on its absolute strength, the romance plot too is very mundane. Take for example, the scene when Akbar asks Jodha if she loves him. In that scene AG raises some drama & expectation. We are led to believe that some out of body type experience is about to be witnessed and just when we have our hopes high, the sun rises and what follows is so disappointing because everything on the screen appears washed out due to overexposure (too bright). Now compare this with the visual pay off in 1969’s Mackenna’s Gold. There too the director, at the start of a scene, winks and nods that something exciting is about to happen, then when the sun rises, what we see is such a visual treat that it has become part of movie legend. In a nutshell this scene from JA sums up the problem, JA does not fulfill the expectation one had of it.

People say the darnest things. Woody Allen illustrates this via a joke about two ladies who go to a restaurant, one says that the food is awful, and the other responds, “Yes, and the quantity is so small too”. Well the point is that if the food is awful then quantity being less should be a good thing. Vice versa when something is good then the quantity being more is equally a good thing. Hence I cannot understand how those that claim JA to be a masterpiece, also complain that it is too long, or that some portions are outright ridiculous. I do understand that something is rotten in the State of Demark Bollywood these days. Ever since CDI and OSO, evey Tom, Dick and Harry wants to be SRK like. Hence I ask, if AG’s JA is a masterpiece, then how come the war portion and political intrigue portion of JA could have been done better by Sanjay Gupta (master of monkey see monkey do style of movie making) ? How can JA be a masterpiece when the domestic squabbles portion could have been done better by Ekta Kapoor ? Likewise, the romance portion could have been done better by K Jo or Yash Chopra and the research on this subject could have been done better by Dr Chandra Prakash Dwivedi. JA could have been something, should have been something, but in essence has ended up being a missed opportunity. The person who should be blamed for JA’s debacle is AG. There is this scene where Akbar goes to a market place to gauge the mood of the people. The scene starts with a wise Akbar advising his advisors how they should behave and ends up proving Akbar to be a buffoon. Or consider the scene where Akbar is his Royal Court gets up and dances. Or the scene where Akbar pleads for more room to make his own decision. With friends like AG, Mohammad Jallaludin Akbar does not need enemies. AG’s Akbar is insecure and weak and led by his nose by Jodha and his advisors.

Hritikh Roshan’s star power has allowed JA a decent opening week but from next week onward the content of the movie will kill any BO prospects. JA proves that HR is a bigger star than Ranbir Kapoor but not as big as SRK or Akshay Kumar. AG should thank his lucky star that HR bailed him out, just imagine what would have happened if JA had Lil C instead (Umrao Jaan anybody?).

Ashwariya in contrast to HR goes a better job. AG it seems has been kind to her in JA. There is rumor going around that while in Jaipur, Ashwariya missed her husband a lot, and hence out of sheer kindness, AG inserted an item song, “Kwaja Mere Kwaja” with a Lil C look alike (with beard and all). Anyway regardless of whether the rumor is correct or not, Aswariya looks at ease in her role.

Related posts:

  1. JODHA AKBAR disappointing movie
  2. jodha akbar promo
  3. Was it Suraj Barjatya directing the movie?
  4. Dont expect a Lagaan or Swades & u’ll be happy!!!
  5. JODHAA AKBAR Censored

There Are 13 Responses So Far. »

  1. yes it was dissappointing movie for many but i dont understand what was gud abt JA that it got great reviews allover

    Yes BoxOffice Collection has surprised everyone who thought that JA will be OSO 2

  2. so CDI is a masterpiece(hhahhahahaha) and wat abt TZP ??? stop behaving like poppat khan (srk) … TZP was far better than OSO (the crapiest shit ever ) and CDI .. Even JA was far far better than OSO and CDI.

  3. by giving d names of the movies like MS Satyus Garma Hawa and Bimal Roys Bandini wat r u trying to prove???? i think u r suffering from some kind of Srk fever!!! CDI had a predictable storyline . You cant win a tournament like dat buddy. Bcoz it was an Indian movie so dey made that happen.

  4. Nishit: Indian has WON the GOLD at COMMONWEALTH GAMES IN 2002 in Female Field Hockey. They beat England by 3-2 in Final. Read the history. Jaideep Sahni has written script based on this victory. Where were you all this time? You didn’t know this? They did when Indian female hockey wasn’t even considered a threat with poor facilities and all village bumpkins, so on and going and beating big teams like Australia, England and Argentina. It’s as good as any world cup.

  5. yes i agree, if the movie is looked in terms of romance its a nice movie to see. with all the bollywood spice mixed to it.. however after a long time some director took the intiative of making an epic on large screen.. and honestly he screwd it up all.. it was a four hour movie the director could have used this four hour to show the life of akbar from birth till his death…he wanted the life of akbar just to roate arround jodh to justify the name of the movie…akbar was also famous for his 9 gems specialy birbal.. however again it was not used in way it should have been … even thou it was a true event but directory really made it bad by mixing the bollywood spice in it.. movie was good ” but they could have made it lot better”

  6. Hey Master buddy i was der very much!! Just for ur info India came 4th in the Kuala Lampur 1998 Commonwealth Games(heheheh!!) and before dat the event was not der. So 4th position was not bad whats ur say??? ru sure the movie was inspired by 2002 Manchester games only??? bcoz before dat also d team was doing well not dat bad with village players!!

  7. We have 2 much time thanx man for dat comment bcoz we are living in a country in which we have plenty of time to watch , relax and enjoy.

    Handful of srk haters?????

    and mr varun debate abt King Khan and i can bet u i am going to beat u in dat just like aamir beats srk in all d movies!!!!!

  8. I should’ve avoided this pothole that masquerades as a film review…

    aIt’s obvious that the author’s idea of acting is the over the top melodrama that bolly has always dished out. Imagine saying “domestic squabbles portion could have been done better by Ekta Kapoor” & all the stuff that follows that line!!! So a Marlon Brando’s understated method acting is now inferior to smriti irani’s????? LOLOL!!!!!!!

    And he seems to have a one comment fits all response. Does he accuse all dissenters of the same “you have come here with multiple IDs” stuff???

  9. Varun…

    Strange that you mention Trimurti… Isn’t that the same super-flop srk movie that Subhash Ghai made…? :-)

    “something is wrong in the State of Bollywood”…? I FULLY agree!!! If a film like OSO can do well, then something is terribly wrong!!!

    My point is Varun, that different people like different things. Some people find Sajid Khan funny, some find him irritating. Some people think OSO is a masterpiece, some think it insults the viewer’s intelligence. To each his own, right?

  10. When ‘Jodha Akbar’ became ‘Dho Ja Akbar’…..

    One day, King Akbar forgot to clean his ass after the bowel cleansing ritual… What did Birbal tell him then?? He said - “Dho Ja Akbar” :)

  11. Chhoro yaar… This forum is really not worth my time & effort. You guys seemed like a bunch of intelligent kids, but you’re positively misguided at the moment.

    What’s most disappointing for someone eager to engage in intelligent debate is that there are no worthy responses coming to my comments. So I walk away, disappointed in this forum & in you unbiased(!) film fans…

  12. but the collections arent dropping . The movie is doing an extra ordinary business in UK and NA and it didnt have the best of realese also. So considering all dat if it manages to be a hit i think its a masterpiece .

  13. arey actually iam leaving for teerth Yatra seriousy :D . r u on orkut by anychance???

Post a Response